What Organization University Professors Say About Elon Musk

Tesla Founder Elon Musk isn’t all that fond of MBAs

On Oct. 28, Elon Musk concluded the deal to acquire Twitter. In the pursuing times, he recognized himself as CEO, fired leading executives, and laid off approximately half of the company’s workforce. Hundreds of Twitter’s remaining staff members have because resigned in rejection of Musk’s takeover and his makes an attempt to tear down the present tradition and change it with what he calls “Twitter 2..”


1 of Musk’s needs for remaining Twitter workers is a entire return to workplace for at the very least 40 several hours a week—a desire that some authorities say is not the most strategic.

“Removing employees’ option to perform versatility, successfully making use of a adhere relatively than a carrot to inspire workers, is misguided,” Ayelet Fishbach, Professor of Behavioural Science at the Chicago Booth School of Business enterprise, tells Organization Leader. “Punishment alternatively of reward will fall short to foster a successful mentality and can negatively impression interactions concerning leaders and workforce resulting in conversation breakdown and a resistance to teamwork.”

Musk’s management design and style and his desire for a return to office, Fishbach claims, finally undermine personnel determination and pleasure.

“There exists a myriad of substitute methods of recognizing attempts that would make staff members sense inspired and engaged and motivate them to return to the business office,” Fishbach claims. “Recognizing people who return to the place of work, describing how office environment existence is tied to teamwork and ultimately advancement opportunities, and generating the business office a much more fulfilling encounter, are just a number of approaches of pulling the carrot rather of the adhere. In the end, achievements is about building personnel come to feel acknowledged and appreciated, instead than excluded and in the end pressured to return towards their will.”


While most specialists can agree that Musk breeds a hard, competitive function surroundings, some say Twitter was overdue for new management. Andy Wu, an assistant professor of small business administration at Harvard Small business Faculty, is 1 expert who is not counting Musk out very nevertheless.

“Musk is undoubtedly a tricky-charging, impulsive, and possibility-tolerant leader, and he’s inclined to go for the sorts of modifications at Twitter that I can not imagine any other CEO or entrepreneur going for,” Wu suggests in an job interview with The Atlantic. “I do imagine there is some logic to the insanity.”

Wu isn’t outright in expressing that Musk is a “good” CEO, but he does not essentially say Musk is a “bad” 1 both.

“Musk is a one particular-of-a-sort CEO,” Wu clarifies. “I will say, on the upside, what Musk has completed so significantly at Tesla and SpaceX is really unbelievable and outstanding and seriously special, as significantly as his technology of company leaders in phrases of the volume of scale and methods needed to mass-produce electric powered autos and create commercial spaceships. It’s unfathomable, and he truly got there.”

And it is Musk’s leadership, Wu thinks, that is required to remodel the upcoming of Twitter—or any foreseeable future it has left.

“The essential punch line here is that Twitter was basically in pretty terrible form and did not fairly have a potential in any case,” Wu claims. “In terms of definitely difficult problems, this is the type of CEO you likely have to have to test out. Twitter is truly a pretty, really tough small business challenge that no one else has been equipped to solve. So at this issue, we may require to, like, swing the car all over and see what takes place.”

Resources: Enterprise Chief, The Atlantic