Ms Giuffre, 39, has reportedly signed a e book deal 12 several years in the producing which is set to depth alleged conferences with Prince Andrew.
She statements she was trafficked by convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging the Duke of York sexually assaulted her when she was 17.
Last yr, Andrew, 62, settled a civil declare by Ms Giuffre towards him with a reported £3 million out-of-courtroom settlement.
Andrew has regularly denied the allegations and the undisclosed sum was not an admission of legal responsibility.
As part of that settlement, each events consented to a one-calendar year gag clause which has prevented Ms Giuffre from repeating any allegations in opposition to the Prince.
Even so, the agreement ends in March, just weeks forward of King Charles’ coronation on Might the 6.
A publishing insider informed The Mirror about ideas to “maximise” Ms Giuffre’s guide release “with no even bigger situation than the crowning of the King”.
The insider additional: “All eyes will be on the Royal Family in the months top up to Charles’s coronation.
“Guide releases are all about timing, and though there is speculation about no matter if Andrew will be witnessed at Westminister Abbey or on the Buckingham Palace balcony, what is particular he will be viewed on each bookshelf close to the globe.
“For the money the publisher has used signing Virginia, they want to maximise their return.
“There will be no even larger celebration for her book than the crowning of the king.”
Read Extra: Prince William ‘feels really betrayed’ as Harry broke down close bond
While Ms Giuffre may not be capable to repeat allegations about intercourse with Prince Andrew, she could however detail an alleged meetings with him even though she was with Epstein, in accordance to the insider.
The insider included: “Possibly way, it pours further more embarrassment on Andrew, the royals and the biggest working day of his individual brother’s life.”
The settlement agreed among Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre was not an admission of guilt by the Duke of York. He has constantly and vehemently denied any incorrect undertaking.
The Duke of York’s representatives have been approached for comment.