Novak Djokovic has caught the awareness at the Australian Open right after staying handed a take note on a bottle by his team through his match versus Andrey Rublev. The former entire world No 1 lifted eyebrows earlier in the match when a member of his assist crew were being spotted attaching a notice to a drinks bottle right before handing it to an Australian Open up formal to give to Djokovic.
The clip promptly went viral on social media, even though it is within just the guidelines for this year’s event for gamers to get on-courtroom coaching. The 2023 Grand Slam rulebook states: “In 2023 an Off-courtroom coaching trial will be done at all Grand Slam tournaments.”
And Djokovic seems to be making use of the new rule to his gain at the 2023 Australian Open. Just 3 games into his quarter-closing match against Rublev, Djokovic’s support workforce all over again handed more than a thriller observe to the Serbian by attaching it to a beverages bottle.
The new principles in place for this 12 months condition gamers are permitted verbal communication with their group so extensive as they are on the exact side of the court and indicators have to have to be employed if they’re reverse one an additional. The information on a bottle elevated the notice of Eurosport’s commentary staff with Chris Bradnam joking about the Serbian’s secrecy.
“What information are they receiving across?” Bradnam claimed on Eurosport. “The liquids. If that’s heading to help Novak Djokovic and he bottles it for sale, he’d make a fortune.”
Djokovic’s wife, Jelena Djokovic, raged on social media back again in November soon after a video of his group mixing a consume during the Paris Masters whilst seeking to block a person recording them went viral. The movie was quickly seen above 15 million times with some urging for more transparency on the substances players take.
The bottle incident was played down by Australian tennis star John Millman, who termed the suspicions a “ridiculous idea”. And Jelena Djokovic additional to the defence of her husband, questioning why there ongoing to be a highlight on the tennis icon’s actions.
“Not every little thing you see is controversial. It could be non-public. Is that allowed?” she said at the time. “I do not see something dodgy.
“In simple fact, I see people today striving to be non-public about their business enterprise in a globe where all people feels like they have just about every appropriate to place camera at you each time they want. Seemingly, seeking/trying to be non-public can make you dodgy today.”